Skip to main content

Disputes & Agency Proceedings

Litigation & Alternative Dispute Resolution

Employment Litigation

Employment disputes in Connecticut proceed under a matrix of state and federal statutes, administrative exhaustion prerequisites, and common-law doctrines. Claims under the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (CFEPA), CGS §§ 46a-51 et seq.1, prohibit workplace discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, and require administrative exhaustion through the CHRO prior to bringing an action in Connecticut Superior Court. Parallel federal claims arise under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Benefit claims are governed by ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., while common-law theories govern wrongful termination in violation of public policy and breach of contract.

Statutory remedies vary significantly by claim. Under CGS § 46a-1042, a plaintiff prevailing under CFEPA may recover back pay, front pay, compensatory damages, attorney's fees, and equitable relief; punitive damages are unavailable under CFEPA following Tomick v. UPS. Under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, punitive damages are available upon proof of malice or reckless indifference, subject to statutory employer-size caps.

Discrimination claims are evaluated under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework: the plaintiff must establish a prima facie case, shifting the burden to the employer to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory business reason, which the plaintiff must then demonstrate is a pretext for discrimination. Summary judgment is typically the decisive procedural stage where this evidentiary record is tested.

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Disputes may resolve outside court through direct negotiation, formal mediation, or binding arbitration. Each mechanism carries distinct procedural consequences:

  • Direct Negotiation: Structured demands and counteroffers that preserve confidentiality and client control over timing and terms.
  • Mediation: Facilitated negotiations before an experienced neutral to evaluate trial exposure and bridge valuation gaps without surrender of claims.
  • Arbitration: Binding private adjudication conducted under specialized rules (e.g., AAA or JAMS), subject to statutory enforceability limits such as the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act.

I represent clients across all ADR forums, assessing claim valuation, drafting confidential settlement agreements, and establishing enforceable release terms.

Litigation Practice & Discovery Control

My litigation practice covers Connecticut Superior Court, the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, and appellate proceedings. Representation spans pleadings, targeted motion practice, rigorous deposition practice, and dispositive motions.

In employment litigation, discovery often represents the largest driver of expense and delay. I enforce strict proportionality under Connecticut Practice Book § 13-2 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1), actively contesting overbroad requests, limiting electronically stored information (ESI) burdens, and ensuring discovery remains strictly tethered to the claims and defenses asserted.

For Employers

Defense strategy begins with an early factual audit: isolating contemporaneous documentation, testing the consistency of disciplinary actions, and identifying legal deficiencies in the complaint. I draft motions to strike legally insufficient counts, enforce arbitration agreements, manage discovery proportionally, and pursue summary judgment to terminate exposure before trial.

For Employees

Critical Deadline: 300 Days

CFEPA claims must be filed with the CHRO within 300 days of the discriminatory act under CGS § 46a-82(f)(2)3. Missing this deadline permanently bars otherwise viable claims.

For employees facing unlawful termination, harassment, or retaliation, litigation begins with administrative exhaustion, followed by filing in Superior Court upon release of jurisdiction. Representation focuses on developing pretext evidence through depositions and contemporaneous communications to recover statutory damages, back pay, front pay, and attorney's fees.

Authorities Cited

  1. CGS §§ 46a-51 et seq. ↩
  2. CGS § 46a-104 ↩
  3. CGS § 46a-82(f)(2) ↩