Practice Areas
Defense Employment Litigation
Defending Connecticut employers against administrative charges and lawsuits alleging discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and other workplace claims.
What I Offer
I defend Connecticut employers against employment-related claims, from responding to agency charges at the CHRO or EEOC to handling all phases of litigation in state and federal court.
What Defense Employment Litigation Is
Defense employment litigation involves representing employers who are accused of violating workplace laws. This practice includes responding to administrative charges filed with agencies like the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) or the EEOC. It also covers all stages of a lawsuit, from initial investigation and discovery to filing dispositive motions like summary judgment. The goal is to resolve claims efficiently by showing that the employer's actions were based on legitimate, non-discriminatory business reasons and complied with state and federal law.
Additional Information
Initial Claim Assessment
An employment claim against an employer usually arrives as a CHRO charge, EEOC notice, or court complaint. The first step is to understand what the employee alleges, what documents exist, and whether the decision or event at the center of the claim was documented contemporaneously. Defense strategy follows from that assessment, not from generic templates.
Claims may arise under Connecticut anti-discrimination law, federal Title VII and related statutes, wage and hour rules, ERISA, or common-law wrongful discharge theories. Each carries different elements, deadlines, and remedies. The defense has to match the specific claim, not treat every case as interchangeable.
Responding to Agency Charges and Lawsuits
Many matters begin at the CHRO or EEOC before they reach Superior Court. Position statements, document production, and witness interviews at the agency stage often become the factual record in later litigation. I represent employers through investigation, conciliation, and public hearing when a charge does not resolve administratively.
In court, summary judgment is the main path to resolution before trial. Whether that motion succeeds depends on whether the employer can show a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the action and whether the employee's evidence creates a genuine dispute. I have obtained summary judgment and dismissal in wage and hour, ERISA, ADA, and discrimination matters where the record supported the motion.
The Importance of Documentation
Performance reviews, discipline notices, investigation notes, and the emails surrounding a termination decision are what courts actually read. Gaps in that record are hard to fix after a charge is filed. I work with employers to assemble what exists, identify what is missing, and evaluate whether the documented reason for the action matches what managers actually did.
Policy compliance matters too. A handbook that managers ignored, or a harassment investigation that was never completed, undermines defenses that would otherwise be available. Fixing the record before responding to an agency letter is usually easier than explaining the gap later.
How Engagements Work
Defense work is billed at the hourly rate on the Fees & Services page. Some matters resolve at the agency stage; others proceed through discovery, motion practice, and trial or settlement.